THE REASON WHY MANISHA KOIRALA NEARLY TURNED DOWN MANI RATNAM’S BOMBAY
Once upon a time, in the glitzy realm of Bollywood, a captivating tale unfolded—one that would test the resolve of a budding star and redefine the boundaries of cinematic convention. At the heart of this narrative was the illustrious Manisha Koirala, a luminous presence whose ascent in Hindi cinema was nothing short of meteoric. Having dazzled audiences with her debut in Subhash Ghai’s “Saudagar” and subsequent performances in notable films like “1942: A Love Story” and “Criminal,” Manisha stood on the precipice of greatness.

Yet, when the opportunity to star in Mani Ratnam’s magnum opus, “Bombay,” presented itself, Manisha found herself grappling with uncertainty. The prospect of portraying a mother on screen, amidst the rigid norms of the industry, cast a shadow of doubt upon her aspirations. In an era where leading actresses were often cautioned against such roles, fearing perpetual typecasting, Manisha hesitated.
It was amidst this swirling tempest of apprehension that a guiding beacon emerged in the form of Ashok Mehta, the venerable cinematographer with whom Manisha had previously collaborated. With unwavering conviction, Mehta implored her to seize the opportunity, extolling the virtuosity of Ratnam’s craft and the profound resonance of the film’s narrative. His impassioned plea ignited a spark within Manisha, dispelling the shadows of doubt that had clouded her vision.
Thus emboldened, Manisha embarked on a transformative journey to Chennai, where she underwent a metamorphosis, both on and off screen. Amidst the bustling sets and the palpable energy of creativity, she embraced her role as Shaila Banu with fervor and determination. As the cameras rolled and the poignant tale of love and resilience unfolded, Manisha found herself not merely portraying a character but embodying the very essence of the film’s philosophy—a testament to the enduring power of unity amidst adversity.
Looking back on her decision with a heart brimming with gratitude, Manisha acknowledges the profound impact that “Bombay” had on her career and her soul. It was a turning point, not just in her cinematic journey but in her understanding of the transformative potential of storytelling. And thus, against the backdrop of the glittering celluloid, Manisha’s journey serves as a poignant reminder of the indomitable spirit that resides within every artist—a spirit that dares to defy convention and embrace the limitless possibilities of imagination.
Recommended Articles

Dilip Kumar’s “Mughal-e-Azam”, released in 1960, holds a special place in the history of Indian cinema as the first Bollywood film shot in three languages. Directed by K. Asif, the magnum opus, featuring Prithviraj Kapoor, Madhubala, and Dilip Kumar, began its ambitious journey in 1944 and faced numerous challenges before making it to the big screen 16 years later.
This cinematic masterpiece, initially released in black-and-white, achieved iconic status and, in 2009, underwent a re-release in colour print. The film’s timeless narrative, coupled with its opulent production, resonates with audiences even today, making it a cult classic in the period drama genre.

What sets Mughal-e-Azam apart is the lesser-known fact that it was a trilingual film, shot in Hindi, Tamil, and English. While the Hindi version soared to great heights, the Tamil version met with an unexpected setback at the box office, leading to its commercial failure. Surprised by this turn of events, the makers decided not to release the English version, abandoning the idea altogether.
The film’s journey, marked by hurdles and triumphs, reflects the dedication and vision of its creators. Despite facing challenges, Mughal-e-Azam remains an enduring masterpiece, with every aspect of the epic, from its dialogues to its songs, holding a special place in the hearts of film enthusiasts. This trilingual experiment, although not without its setbacks, adds another layer to the rich tapestry of Mughal-e-Azam’s cinematic legacy.
Recommended Articles

Sunil Dutt, the cool and charming Bollywood hero, surprised everyone by becoming a baddie on the big screen! He wasn’t just the romantic hero; he aced the role of a villain, playing a dacoit (bad guy) in a whopping 20 movies during his awesome career.
Remember “Mother India” in 1957? That’s where it all began. Dutt took on the challenge of playing Birju, a rebellious son, proving he’s not your typical goody-two-shoes hero. But wait, there’s more! He didn’t stop there; he ventured into the dacoit genre, bringing a whole new vibe to those bad guy roles.

Movies like “Gauri,” “Mujhe Jeene Do,” and “Mera Saaya” showcased his bad-boy skills. But here’s the twist – Dutt didn’t play your regular one-dimensional villain. Nope, he added layers to these characters, making you feel for them and think about right and wrong.
One of his top-notch performances as a bad guy was in “Pran Jaye Par Vachan Na Jaye” in 1974. He played a tough dacoit with shades of gray, making us question who the real good guys are.
Sunil Dutt didn’t just act; he changed the game in Bollywood. Back in the day, actors were stuck in one type of role, but not Dutt. He broke free from the hero stereotype, showing future actors that it’s cool to experiment with different characters.
Let’s celebrate Sunil Dutt’s legacy! He wasn’t just the smooth hero, not just the romantic lead. He was the guy who embraced the dark side, proving that real greatness lies in exploring all sides of life, even the shadowy bits people avoid. Sunil Dutt wasn’t just a Bollywood hero; he was a master storyteller, adding cool layers to Indian cinema with every role he rocked.
Recommended Articles

The records of Bollywood history are filled with tales of passion, controversy, and tragedy. Among the legendary figures, the life of Bollywood actress Meena Kumari stands out, and woven into her narrative is the equally compelling story of her then-husband, director Kamal Amrohi.

Marriage and Controversies: Meena Kumari and Kamal Amrohi exchanged vows on February 14, 1952, in a union that would become as notorious as it was iconic. Intriguingly, Kamal was already married, with children from his first marriage. The initial years of their marriage were engulfed in whispers of turmoil, with reports surfacing about Meena Kumari grappling with an invasion of privacy both in her personal and professional life.
adsplacement
The Pakeezah Conundrum: The pinnacle of their union was Kamal Amrohi’s ambitious project, “Pakeezah,” a film envisioned for Meena Kumari. However, the trajectory of this cinematic masterpiece was far from smooth. The film took a staggering 15 years to complete, mirroring the tumultuous relationship of its lead actors. This prolonged period saw Meena Kumari drowning in alcoholism and reportedly engaging in a brief affair with a leading actor.
Amid the strife, the couple parted ways in 1964 after enduring 12 years of a toxic marriage. Following the divorce, Meena Kumari’s health took a toll, diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. While receiving treatment in London and Switzerland, she defied medical advice and returned to India, resuming the shooting of “Pakeezah.”
adsplacement
The Price of Success: “Pakeezah” eventually released on February 4, 1972, marking a cinematic triumph for Kamal Amrohi. However, the joy was tinged with sorrow. Meena Kumari, the enigmatic actress who poured her heart and soul into the film, was inching toward her untimely death. The film’s success, hailed as Kamal Amrohi’s crowning achievement, overshadowed the personal cost exacted during its creation.
On March 31, 1972, Meena Kumari breathed her last breath, leaving behind a legacy of unparalleled artistry and tragic love.
adsplacement
Legacy and Reflection: The legacy of “Pakeezah” endures as a testament to Kamal Amrohi’s visionary directorial skills. While the film garnered nationwide accolades, it came at the profound cost of losing Meena Kumari. Kamal had won the praise of audiences and critics alike, but he had also lost his wife and an extraordinary actress.
In the trivia of Bollywood’s golden era, the love saga of Meena Kumari and Kamal Amrohi stands as a poignant chapter—a tale of passion, controversy, and ultimately, the heavy price paid for artistic brilliance.
Recommended Articles

Ever wonder about the jaw-dropping costs behind the glitz and glamour of Bollywood? Well, here’s a nugget of movie trivia that might leave you wide-eyed. In the realm of film finances, Director Madhur Bhandarkar once found himself in a peculiar situation – the budget allocated for Kareena Kapoor’s wardrobe in the movie “Heroine” exceeded the entire budget he had set aside for his debut film, “Chandni Bar.”

Once in a candid revelation to a leading daily, Madhur spilled the beans on the staggering expenses involved in crafting the perfect look for Kareena Kapoor in “Heroine.” He cheekily recounted telling Kareena that the cost of her wardrobe in the film surpassed the entire budget he had at his disposal for his first venture, “Chandni Bar.”
Recalling the challenging journey of his debut film, Madhur shared, “My first film did not work, so there was a lot of pressure on me, but I was hell-bent on making the film the way I wanted to. I made the movie on a very small budget.” This small budget, as it turns out, was notably smaller than what Madhur humorously spent on Kareena’s wardrobe in “Heroine.”
Back in 2012, Madhur Bhandarkar even took to Twitter to playfully highlight the stark contrast, stating, “I made Chandni Bar in 2001 with 1.5 crores which today, a decade later, is #Heroine’s costume budget for Kareena! How times have changed!” The revelation not only sheds light on the evolving dynamics of film budgets but also adds a touch of glamour to the behind-the-scenes intricacies of Bollywood.
As we reminisce about the extravagant looks that Kareena Kapoor adorned in the intense drama “Heroine,” it’s fascinating to note how the cost of her wardrobe surpassed the entire financial canvas of Madhur Bhandarkar’s maiden film. Talk about the dazzling price tags that come with the glitzy world of cinema! Interestingly, despite the sartorial splendor, “Heroine” fizzled out at the Box Office upon its release.
